Yogic
Attainment in Relation to Awareness of Precognitive Targets
(1)
S.M.Roney
– Dougal, Psi Research Centre, Britain
J. Solfvin, Centre for Indic Studies, USA
Abstract:
This study explored whether long-term yoga/meditation practice
facilitates psi awareness. Data were collected in an Indian
ashram setting in 2003 and 2004 from yoga practitioners with
three levels of initiation: students (ST) (0.3–15 years practice);
sanyassins (SN) (1-10 years practice); and swamis (SW) (4-33
years practice). These preliminary experiments focused on adapting
Western laboratory procedures to the ashram setting with a Macintosh
laptop serving as a portable laboratory. Each participant had
a short meditation followed by an awareness period to precognitively
perceive a target video clip that they would see at the end
of the session. They then rated four target clips on a 1 – 100
scale for similarity with their awareness experience. A re-analysis
(using effect size r) showed no overall significant effect in
either year (2003: r = -0.09; 2004: r = 0.08). Advanced practitioners
(SW) in both years showed non-significant psi-hitting (2003:
r = 0.21; 2004: r= 0.07), whereas the other two groups (SN &
ST) were more variable in their scoring (2003: SN r = -0.23
& ST r = -0.38; 2004: SN r = 0.05 & ST r = 0.13). In
2003, in the line with the hypothesis, the advanced group (SW)
scored significantly better than SN (p = .05) or ST (p = .04).
In 2004 these differences became non-significant. Implications
and possible explanations are explored.
During
the 1970s interest in maximising psi awareness focused on altered
states of consciousness (Braud, 1974, 1978; Honorton, 1977;Tart,
1969, 1975; Ullman & Krippner, 1979). Part of this programme
of research investigated meditation as a psi-conducive state
(for reviews see Honorton, 1977; Braud, 1989; Schmeidler, 1994).
Most of the research used beginners in meditation and only a
handful of studies were run, with mixed results, that do however
give highly significant results on a combined analysis (Honorton,
1977).
Consciousness research is central in parapsychology. In the
1970s, Braud (1974) introduced the concept of the psi - conducive
state. This is a model which has driven much of the parapsychological
research into altered states of consciousness as a state conducive
to the experience of psychic phenomena. The model states that
psi functioning is enhanced when there is:
1) cortical arousal sufficient to maintain conscious awareness;
2) muscular relaxation;
3) reduction of sensory input;
4) internal attention.
In other words, when the receiver is in a state of sensory relaxation
and is minimally influenced by ordinary perception and proprioception
(Braud, 1975).
At the same time Honorton (1981) was developing his model of
internal attention states from his readings of the classic yoga
text known as Patanjali’s sutras. These sutras (Satyananda,
1982) state that, when one attains samadhi the “siddhis” (psychic
powers) manifest. Meditation techniques take us in to a state
of consciousness that is considered traditionally to be a heightened,
or even advanced, state of consciousness. In meditation there
is internal noise reduction, external noise reduction, and various
psycho-physiological correlates, e.g. alpha rhythm, increased
skin resistance, which have been found to be associated with
greater psi awareness (Honorton, 1977). A full discussion of
Patanjali’s yoga sutras in relation to psi research has been
done by Braud (2006).
LITERATURE
REVIEW
During
1970’s – 1980’s, several experiments were conducted which suggested
that meditation might help one to attain a state of consciousness
conducive to psychic (psi) awareness.(2). In
this early research, the unspoken assumption was that merely
practicing meditation would enhance psychic awareness. The first
study was by Schmeidler (1970). She reported that students gave
significant ESP scores (p=.01) after they had been instructed
by a swami in pranayama (breathing techniques) and meditation.
The pre-meditation scores were at chance. Dukhan and Rao (1973)
also tested for pre- and post-meditation psi scoring. They worked
with Western and Indian students in an ashram in South India
using a combination of meditation practices. Beginners and more
advanced meditators both obtained highly significant psi-missing
prior to meditation (beginners p=10-6; advanced p=.012) and
significant psi-hitting after meditation (beginners and advanced
p=10-4). Roll and Zill (1981) also found a significant difference,
with the participants once again scoring negatively before the
meditation and positively after. They do not specify the degree
of meditation skill of the participants. They state that they
consider that these results are more due to the participants
conforming to the experimenters’ wishes than to the effect of
meditation per se, because the significance of the study was
primarily due to the decreased scoring before the meditation.
Compliance with experimenters’ wishes is an effect of which
one must always be aware.
In contrast, Stanford & Palmer (1973) worked with a single
subject (Bessent) who meditated before the ESP session and whose
EEG was being monitored. In those sessions in which he produced
relatively high alpha waves, he showed stronger psi (p<.005).
As well as exploring with different types of participants, experimenters
also worked with both forced-choice and free-response methodology.
Rao, Dukhan and Rao (1978) used both methods testing participants
both before and after a half-hour meditation session. The participants
scored significantly higher on both types of test after the
meditation. Braud and Boston (1986) used free-response methodology
with a relaxation tape session, and obtained significant scoring
with 25 meditators. They used trained meditators from the Center
of Healing and Enlightenment in Houston, but to what degree
and what sort of meditation is not specified. Harding and Thalbourne
(1981) tested people trained in Transcendental Meditation (TM),
using 3 groups: non-meditators, ordinary TM meditators and siddhas
(advanced TM meditators). Again they used both forced-choice
and free-response methods, but they obtained null results. They
considered that this was because the meditators had not really
wanted to participate and considerable persuasion had been used
to obtain participants for the study. Like Harding and Thalbourne,
Rao and Rao (1982) used people who had trained in TM, though
in this case only for a week. They compared those who had done
no meditation with those who had done the one-week course. They
were tested for both ESP and subliminal perception. The meditators
scored above chance with both forms of target, whilst the controls
scored at chance.
Rao and Rao’s (1982) study suggests that in meditation one is
learning to become aware – this awareness and openness being
a generalized form of sensitivity to incoming information whether
of the subliminal or psychic form. Some meditation practices
result in habituation to external signals, e.g. yogic, where
attention is inward, and others, e.g. Zen, show no habituation
at all (Murphy, Donovan & Taylor, 1999). The yogic teachings
stress again and again that one is learning to become more aware
at all levels. They state that removing the noise of the internal
dialogue allows greater sensitivity and awareness in general,
of which psi awareness is an aspect that occurs at a certain
stage in meditation attainment. Whilst meditation has been linked
with other psi-conducive states techniques, such as the Ganzfeld,
it may be a very different state in that the person is being
trained to go ‘beyond mind,’ into a state of pure awareness
where there is very little or no thought. Honorton (1996) reports
on his Ganzfeld database collected during the 1980s, and finds
that practice of a mental discipline helps novice Ganzfeld participants
to score better on the initial session. However, meditation
is not partialled out from hypnosis, relaxation or biofeedback
exercises, so in this analysis we cannot specifically see the
effect of meditation on novice Ganzfeld participants.
A meta-analysis of all the research by 1976 shows that overall
there were 9 significant meditation psi experiments out of a
total of 16, giving an overall p= 6x10-12 (Honorton, 1977).
Schmeidler (1994) who summarises the research from 1978-1992
concludes that: “meditation is conducive to ESP success if (and
only if) the meditators wholeheartedly accept the experimental
procedure and the goals of the research.”
The
Ashram Studies
A so far unexplored hypothesis, which comes directly from Patanjali’s
sutras, is that degree of meditation attainment is
related to enhanced psi functioning. Patanjali states that the
‘siddhis’ (psychic faculties) manifest on attainment of Samadhi.
There are two possibilities here: one is that as one practices
meditation, so one gradually develops greater one-pointedness
and greater awareness and bit by bit greater psi awareness,
which is the hypothesis that parapsychological research has
used so far. The other is that only when one attains Samadhi
(total one-pointed concentration) does the psi awareness manifest.
Local folklore considers that the more adept one is as a yogi,
the more psychic one is, but this has never been explored scientifically.
An invitation to teach parapsychology at a university in an
ashram (a yoga monastery) in India enabled this research to
be conducted with experienced practitioners, swamis (yogic monks
and nuns) as well as with inexperienced practitioners (students).
This is essentially field research, taking the methodology,
which has been designed in Western laboratories, and adapting
it so that we could work with the participants in their own
setting.
In 2002, a number of different possible experiments, were run
with students (Roney-Dougal, 2002). The design of the two studies
being reported here emerged as being the most suitable for development.
Only students participated and static pictures were used as
a target in a telepathy design. They did not give any significant
results, but gave a suggestion that this topic was amenable
to research and that the free-response method was suitable for
research in the ashram setting.
Building on these findings, a preliminary experiment was run
from January to March 2003, with individuals who were living
and working in the ashram. Changes in methodology were made
in order to tighten up the procedure and a computer programme
(Precog) was designed. Otherwise the basic free-response design
was kept the same, to see if significant results would emerge
in this situation, and if it was feasible to run a more tightly
controlled experiment in future years, when circumstances permitted.
Then in 2004 the final ashram ESP experiment was run using equal
numbers of participants in each of the three groups that were
identified in 2003, each participant undertaking six sessions.
A modified version of the Precog programme was again used as
this had shown considerable suitability for work in this setting.
Hypothesis
The hypothesis for these experiments was:
Those with a greater level of yogic attainment; i.e. more years
of practice and greater degree of attainment, will show greater
psi awareness, such that the swamis will rank the target correctly,
significantly more often than the students.
This hypothesis was decided upon prior to the preliminary studies
being undertaken. The design, procedure, computer programme,
questionnaires, etc., were all then developed, dependent on
what was appropriate for this particular setting, changes being
made year by year. Then, when Bial funded a formal continuation
of these studies, J. Solfvin joined the team as statistical
analyst, and this paper is a result of his reanalysis of the
data in preparation for the more formal studies being undertaken
at present. The hypothesis being tested has however remained
consistent throughout.
METHOD
A
basic free-response design was used in which a computer programme
chose a video clip at random from a pool. After meditating,
the participants aimed to visualise this target, and after that
saw a set of four video clips one of which was the target clip.
These were rated on a 100-point scale according to similarity
with the visualization experience. The target picture was then
shown.
Materials
A precognition computer programme (Precog) was designed by Jezz
Fox, from Liverpool University, for an Apple Macintosh G4 Powerbook.
In 2003, the Kathy Dalton set of dynamic targets (Dalton, Steinkamp
& Sherwood, 1996), which has 25 sets of 4 video clips, was
used. In 2004, an adapted set of the University College Northampton
target set, which has 23 sets of 4 video clips, was used. These
were amended so as to contain primarily pleasant or neutral
material, with no overt violence or sexual content.
A yogic attainment questionnaire (YAQ) was designed in 2002
with the help of the students, and amended in line with improvements
whilst using it that first year, and later with help from David
Luke. This amended questionnaire was used in 2003 and then further
developed for use in 2004, again with the assistance of David
Luke. This questionnaire has two main parameters: the first
is the number of years the participants have practised different
yogic disciplines, such as physical asanas, breathing techniques
(pranayama) which are thought to be related to the emotions,
and meditation, which works at the mental level. There are also
cleansing practices (shatkarmas), which were included in the
2004 questionnaire, as yogic theory states that these facilitate
the manifestation of psi. This enabled the degree of yogic attainment
to be clearly specified, each participant estimating the number
of hours per day or week that they practised the various techniques,
as well as specifying the number of years for which they have
practised them. In addition they stated whether or not they
were practising regularly at the time of doing the research.
In 2004, a second part of the questionnaire addressed a specific
meditation practice (antar mouna) and the level the participant
had attained with this practice.
Design
A precognition design was used so that the sessions could be
run without any assistants, enabling SRD to work with the percipients
at any time that was mutually convenient for them. By its very
nature precognition is double-blind, thus allowing full control
with minimal need for the usual laboratory facilities of sound-proof
rooms, etc. Further details are given in the procedure section.
The programme chose a target set, such that the participant
never received the same set more than once. The participant
was shown all four video clips, which they rated on a 1–100
point rating scale. The programme then showed the target video,
chosen at random out of the four in the set.
As the 2003 sessions were completely exploratory, attempting
to find a methodology that worked in the ashram situation, SRD
accepted anyone who wished to take part and ran as many sessions
with them as they were able to do. This enabled 102 sessions
to be run in an 8-week period.
In 2004, the design was tightened in that there were equal numbers
in each of the three groups identified in 2003, and each person
did six trials so that a more reasonable estimate of their psychic
awareness could be assessed. This resulted in a total of 108
trials run in a 10-week period.
In both years, the yogic attainment questionnaire (YAQ) was
completed by each participant. In 2003 this was after the first
session, as each participant completed different numbers of
sessions and some did only one session. In 2004 they completed
it after their final session, when they were also interviewed.
Participants
In 2003, the study included any visitors (V), students (ST),
sannyasins, (SN, those who have taken some degree of yogic initiation;
jigyasu and karma sannyasins), and swamis (SW, also known as
poorna sannyasins, as they have taken full yogic initiation)
who wanted to participate, with a range of 4 months to 33 years
experience of yoga. This permitted a good spread of degree of
yogic attainment to be accessed, though inevitably there was
overlap between the groups both in terms of number of years
of practice and some students had received some degree of initiation.
In these cases they were assigned to the sannyasin group. The
numbers “by chance” turned out to be very even with a total
of 34 people participating, of whom 12 were students or visitors,
10 were initiated to some degree (jigyasu and karma sannyasins),
and 12 were swamis. Between them they completed 102 sessions,
which again were “by chance” very evenly balanced, with the
swami and sannyasin groups doing 35 trials each and the students
32 trials. Considering that this was not pre-planned at all,
it is very pleasing to have such equivalent numbers. The swamis
were older on average and more female than male swamis participated,
whereas gender numbers were fairly even for the other two groups.
Another difference is that the swamis were, in general, Westerners,
whilst the other two groups were composed primarily of Indians.
Thus, there were demographic differences between the swamis
and the others.
In 2004, 6 students, 6 sannyasins and 6 swamis did six sessions
each, making a total of 108 sessions. The swamis are once again
clearly a different group from both the students and the sannyasins
in terms both of age and of number of years of practice. Also,
the swamis were entirely Westerners, whilst the other two groups
were once again primarily Indians. Whilst gender was equal for
both sannyasins and students, only one male swami participated.
Procedure
In 2003, on arrival the participant was told the basic design
and hypothesis of the experiment, and their details were written
into the computer. The experiment was discussed until the participant
felt comfortable. A candle and incense were lit to create a
conducive environment and the participant then settled down
to meditate for 10 minutes. Some used the candle for their meditation,
but each person was free to choose what meditation technique
they used, how they sat, etc., as there was such a wide range
of expertise.
After 10 minutes SRD entered the room and guided the participant
through a “sankalpa,” or resolution, in which they repeated
a positive statement of intent to become aware of the target
video clip that the computer would show them at the end of the
session. They then had a 4-minute awareness session in which
they were instructed to become aware of the chidakasha, which
is the space one sees behind one’s closed eyelids, and to become
aware of any impressions they experienced whilst looking into
their own mental space.
After this period they were asked to complete their meditation
and then went through to the computer. There was a 5-minute
period in which they were encouraged to draw out and to describe
any impressions they had received. They then saw four video
stills on the computer. The participant chose which video they
wanted to watch and this played as a full screen video. They
then chose their second video to watch, etc. SRD discussed the
four videos with the participant in the light of their impressions,
and the participant rated the videos. The computer then showed
the target video, which was discussed. After the first session,
the participant then completed a yogic attainment questionnaire.
In 2004 the major change to this procedure was that the meditation
period was 15 minutes and a specific meditation technique (ajapa
japa) was done by all participants, with a 4-minute awareness
period following. Also, the amount of discussion during the
judging process was decreased from 2003, the participants doing
the judging more or less on their own, after an initial training
session.
RESULTS
The analyses for this study are primarily descriptive in line
with the exploratory nature of the study. The underlying data
for the psi scoring are the ratings (1-100) assigned to a pool
of four possible targets for each trial. We converted ratings
into ranks for simplicity of analysis.
Part
1: Data from 2003
The
data in show the predominant tendency towards psi-missing. With
the chance level being mean rank of 2.5, and with lower rank
scores indicating psi-hitting, it can be seen that three of
the subgroups are very close to chance expectation on psi scoring
(male & female SW, male ST), and the remaining three groups
are psi-missing, but not significantly so. Thus, there’s no
suggestion of any subgroup scoring significantly different from
chance expectation, nor is there any indication of between-group
differences. Even the deceptively large visual difference in
Figure 1 between male and female students does not approach
statistical significance.

Figure 1. 2003 Mean Rank for Participants(excluding
visitors)
However,
the picture changes if we note that those subjects who completed
only one or two trials gave poor and inconsistent results, leaving
the 17 subjects who did 3 or more trials, which is arguably
a more valid sampling. In terms of years of yogic practice the
demographics change slightly: students have practiced between
0.6 – 6 years; sannyasins from 2 – 10 years; and swamis from
10 – 33 years.
All participants who completed at least 3 sessions averaged
2.60 (sd=1.13) on the psi task for the 73 sessions, so there
is still non-significant psi-missing overall. However, Figure
2 shows a different pattern than Figure 1. Eliminating the subjects
with less than 3 trials has little effect upon the psi scoring
for the male and female sannyasin and student groups, as can
be seen by comparing the graphs, but both male and female swamis
can be seen to have performed much better than previously revealed.
The swamis mean rank score of 2.26 (sd = 1.16) is in the psi-hitting
direction (t(26) = -1.08, p = .392, two-tailed). When compared
to sannyasins and students, we find swamis performed significantly
better than each of the other groups (SW vs. SN: df=55, p =
.05, one-tailed; and SW vs. ST: df=41, p = .04, one-tailed).
Figure
2. Mean Rank for Selected Participants
It
seems reasonable to assume that excluding those who did not
complete at least 3 sessions gives us a more valid indicator
of psi-scoring for the groups which they represent. This view
is bolstered by reiterating that those participants with only
one or two trials, regardless of group assignment, performed
highly variably on the psi task. Thus, to eliminate them is
to reduce extraneous variance in the psi data. As an added bonus
to this “cleaning” of the dataset, a hitherto unseen trend becomes
visible, the trend for swamis to perform better than sannyasins
and students.
Using
Effect Size Display
At
this point it’s useful to convert the psi scores from average
rank to effect size in order to get a truer picture of the strength
of these data. Effect size facilitates comparisons between groups
with unequal n’s and with data from other years or experimenters.

Figure
3. 2003 Effect Sizes for Selected Participants
The
figure above shows the same data as in Table 2, but displaying
effect size, where positive effect size indicates psi-hitting
while negative effect size indicates psi-missing. In this effect
size display, it can be seen that the 2003 data show some interesting
(absolute value) effect sizes. Psi scoring in parapsychology
ranges widely but generally a psi effect size of .25 to .35
would be considered “successful”. We can see above that the
male and female swami groups show small but respectable positive
effect sizes, while the sannyasins and particularly students
had negative effect sizes (psi-missing tendency). Even in the
absence of statistical significance these effect sizes can be
helpful in planning subsequent research.
We must keep in mind that these results are post-hoc, there
have been multiple analyses and the p-values above are only
presented as a rough indicator of the magnitude of the relationships
under discussion.
Additional
Analyses
In
the data analyses above, there is a potential confound that
clouds the interpretation. In the refined sample, those remaining
in the swami group tend to be older with slightly higher yogic
attainment scores (YAQ). Could this be responsible for the apparent
shift in psi scoring in the swami group? If so, it is in line
with the hypothesis that yogic attainment level is related to
psi awareness.
Additional analyses were conducted to shed light on this. First,
simple Pearson correlations were computed between the mean psi
rank, age, gender, years of practicing yoga, and YAQ. In this
correlation matrix, psi score is not significantly related to
age (r =.15, t(15) = 0.59, p = 0.561, two-tailed), but is significantly
related to YAQ (r = .57, t(15) = 2.69, p = .017, two-tailed).
Higher YAQ corresponds to better psi scoring as was hypothesised.
The YAQ also shows a positive, though non-significant, relationship
with age (r = .33, p = .19, two-tailed), and years of practice
is significantly related to age and YAQ (r = .67 and r = .65,
respectively, both p < .01, two-tailed).
Finally, using multiple regression to predict psi score based
upon both these predictors, we find that the YAQ accounts for
virtually all of the explained variance, and age does not contribute
significantly. Thus, age of participants is not a confound in
this data. Yogic attainment, as defined by the questionnaire
used in this study, may be. We can’t be certain whether it accounts
for the different psi scoring of swamis, sanyassins, and students,
with these small sample sizes.
Part
II: Data from 2004
In
2004, overall, the 18 participants (108 sessions) tended toward
non- significant psi-hitting (mean rank = 2.41, sd = 1.12).
The 2003 overall results tended towards non-significant psi-missing.
The difference in scoring between the two studies is not significant.
Effect
Size Analysis
The
comparison of the groups for 2003 and 2004 can best be viewed
by effect size. Figure 4 compares the ’03 and ‘04 group/gender
breakdown.

Figure
4. Effect Size for 2003 and 2004
This graph shows that while the 2003 data was overall negative,
it actually had the largest (absolute value) effect sizes. The
swamis in 2003 scored at r = .21, a small but respectable positive
effect, while the students and particularly sannyasins were
scoring rather strongly in the opposite direction. In 2004 all
groups show non-significant scoring in the psi-hitting direction.

Figure
5. 2004 Effect Size by Group by Gender
Figures 3 and 5 show the gender breakdown effect sizes for 2003
and 2004 data, respectively. While males and females scored
about the same levels in their respective groups in 2003, that
was not the case in 2004. Overall, in 2004 the females in all
three groups scored positively, though non-significantly (mean
rank = 2.29, E.S. = 0.19, t(65) = -1.54, p = .12, 2-tailed).
Males in 2004 score slightly negatively (mean rank = 2.60, E.S.
= -.09). The overall male-female difference in 2004 is not statistically
significant (p = .17, 2-tailed).
In 2004, female sannyasins score strongest (mean rank = 2.11,
t(17) = -1.61, p = .12, 2-tailed). This is an effect size of
ES(r) = .36, in the range often associated with “good” psi performance.
With male sannyasins scoring nonsignificantly negatively (mean
rank = 2.78, E.S. = -0.29, t(17) = 1.25, p = .23, 2-tailed,),
there is a significant difference between the male and female
psi scoring (t(34) = 2.03, p = .05, 2-tailed). This gender effect
does not hold for the other groups (SW, ST) and may be an artifact
of fortuitous sampling.
The final question for 2004 data is whether the correlation
between psi score and yogic attainment score observed in 2003
was continued. In 2004, psi scoring is slightly correlated with
gender, but near-zero with YAQ, and age, although both are in
the hypothesised direction. Participants who were older and
had higher YAQ scores tended to give more positive psi results.
However, YAQ and age are correlated even more strongly in 2004
than in 2003. Thus, this is a complicated situation for which
we have too little data and too many variables. The most we
can hope for here is to shed some light on this issue for planning
our future studies. We already know that gender is a factor
in this study from our earlier considerations. Now we can see
that this is not entirely clear either. Gender correlates in
2004 with age (which was a potential confound in 2003) and with
YAQ – female participants tend to be younger and have lower
YAQ scores.
DISCUSSION
These
studies have been a preliminary exploration of the hypothesis
that increasing yogic attainment may be related to increasing
psi awareness. In line with this hypothesis, in 2003, with participants
who did at least 3 sessions, there was a significant difference
between the swamis and the other two groups identified on the
basis of yogic initiation level, which was corroborated by the
significant correlation between the YAQ and psi score. This
was not replicated in 2004. The significant difference in 2003
between the swamis and the other two groups occurred primarily
because the other groups scored non-significantly in the psi-missing
direction, whereas in 2004 all groups scored at chance in the
psi-hitting direction. Whilst the scores of the student and
sannyasin groups are non-significant in themselves, the trend
we see is a variability in scoring common to research with unselected
participants. Perhaps the effect of many years of meditation
is indicated by the consistency in scoring exhibited by the
swamis as shown in figures 1, 2, 3 & 4, which, whilst non-significant
in these short studies would, if sustained over a longer period,
show the cumulative deviation exhibited by such studies as those
of the PEAR laboratory (Jahn, Dunne, Nelson, Dobyns & Bradish,
1997).
In the process we have found a methodology that is appropriate
for an ashram situation, so that controlled experiments can
now be run. There was a wide range in nationalities and ages
taking part in this research, so we are far removed from the
typical university experiment that uses undergraduate students
as participants.
The significant difference between the swamis and the other
groups in 2003 occurred primarily because of the non-significant
psi-missing of the students and sannysasins. The participants
felt that they “weren’t doing well” and so this was addressed
at a qualitative level, looking to see what possible reasons
there might have been for this. The following areas were identified
and addressed:
1) Negative emotionality of targets was a contributor to
some psi-missing with certain people. Though from a Western
perspective the Kathy Dalton set of video clips are not
particularly violent or negative, for people living in an
ashram where there are no films, television, radio or newspapers,
to see a tidal wave drowning people, or a person in battle
with a monster, was a shocking experience. Swamis, who have
lived in an ashram for many years, have not been exposed
to modern television and films and so have a very low threshold
to the emotional tension in films that most modern Western
people would hardly notice. There were a number of comments
in which people ranked these targets fourth just because
they did not want to see them again! Therefore, in 2004
a target pool was created that had only positive emotional
or neutral targets, drawn from the Northampton University
target set.
There is also a possibility that cross-cultural differences
affect people’s responses to the target pools. The participant
pool comprised Indians from all parts of India, Australians,
New Zealanders, British (both Anglo and Carribean), Swiss-Indian,
Italian, Serbian, etc. Only one Indian participant stated
that he had no connection with the targets because they
were outside his culture, so this factor appeared to play
a minor role.
2) One possible problem occurred at the judging stage. Because
the participants were novices with regard to free-response
methodology, SRD worked with them at the judging stage.
Some participants found this intrusive and unhelpful, though
many said it was helpful. This is an aspect of the free-response
design that has not been sufficiently investigated, and
which is of great importance. Free-response methodology
is a two-stage process, the first stage requiring open holistic,
intuitive, global, dream mind for reception of the information;
the second using the analytical, logical, judging mind to
decide whether the information is relevant to the actual
target. In the “Ganzfeld-type” of design used here, the
participant does their own interpretation with or without
assistance from the experimenter. In the remote-viewing
design the experimenter helps during the awareness period
and someone else does the judging. Which method is preferable
is open to debate, but the degree of assistance given by
experimenters is rarely mentioned in reports and deserves
to be. One early Ganzfeld study which does address this
issue is that of Palmer, Khamashta & Israelson (1979),
in this case by comparing participant’s own scoring with
that of independent judges.
3)
It is possible that social and cultural dynamics were exhibited
most strongly by the students, e.g. age and gender dynamics,
ashram rules. The participants were working in SRD’s room.
The ashram has a rule that no one is allowed into anyone
else’s room. SRD was in the guesthouse and her room was
being used as an office and SRD had permission to run the
experiment there. However, some people were uncertain as
to the permissibility of entering her room and there could
well have been a level of discomfort.
It is also possible that, as the hypothesis was a comparison,
the students unconsciously psi-missed so as to enable the
swamis to score better! There is a strong element of compliance
in Indian society – a desire to please however that may
manifest, in this case supporting the hypothesis by psi-missing.
As discussed in the introduction, this element of compliance
in a comparison design engendering psi-missing was also
found by Dukhan & Rao (1973) and Roll & Zill (1981).
4)
Related to this is the possibility of an experimenter effect.
SRD noticed that she was more relaxed about the psi-missing
tendency of the students. However, there was tension around
the psi-missing in general, and this is dealt with when
looking at the karma yoga attributes below.
This experimenter effect obviously has greatest chance to
affect results at the judging stage. As mentioned in section
2 above, SRD had to help the participants at the judging
stage so that they could fully understand what they had
to do, especially on their first session - and some participants
only did one or two sessions. At no time did she intervene
in the participants’ choice of target, but her presence
did influence some of the participants, and may well have
influenced their ratings. Whilst SRD may at times have thought
that a picture was the target, she made no conscious choice
at any time and so there is no record of whether she was
using accurate psi during this process. This is an obvious
psychological experimenter effect, and there may also have
been psychic influences.
5)
Another factor is the yogic teaching which states that one
must not put emphasis on the siddhis. Despite the head of
the ashram giving permission for this research, there is
a strong dictum that psi is a forbidden topic. This can
be understood as a variant of the fear of psi (Tart, 1984)
which is so prominent in Western society. Here it does not
manifest as denial of psi, but psi is considered to be an
unwise direction in which to focus one’s intent, to the
extent that people actively avoid the subject at every level.
And yet, in Patanjali’s yoga sutras, one whole chapter is
devoted to a discussion of this aspect of consciousness,
and it is considered that one cannot gain enlightenment
without having gained the siddhis. So the active avoidance
of them is possibly a mistaken attitude. They give us some
of our greatest problems in terms of ego and glamour; spiritual
power is even more corrosive than temporal power; and to
be distracted on to the path of attaining the siddhis for
their own sake is fakirism rather than the path of a yogi.
But one does have to deal with the problems that the siddhis
raise, and so to avoid them can be understood as a fear
of them. Better to be aware of that which can give rise
to problems than to be in ignorance.
6) Another factor is that of ownership resistance (Batcheldor,
1984). In the sessions there was a noticeable feeling of
“doing well,” or the reverse. This will be dealt with more
fully in the following discussion of karma yoga.
Another
possible confound is that the participants were aware of
the hypothesis. This may have influenced their responses
to the questionnaire. The problem of assessing the degree
of yogic attainment is ongoing. Ideally an independent measure
would be preferred to a self-report scale. However, as yet
there does not appear to be an adequate or reliable measure.
So we have here relied on two different measures – the degree
of initiation, which forms the three groups so we could
assess differences between the three groups; and the YAQ
which is based on a self-report of their yogic practices.
Neither is satisfactory.
One
of the most interesting lessons to come out from these
experiments was the realisation that the instructions
SRD was giving to participants in the pre-trial discussion,
and which often were discussed in the post-trial feedback,
were remarkably similar to the attributes of karma
yoga as defined by Sw. Niranjanananda Saraswati (Niranjanananda,
1993). He lists six attributes of karma yoga as follows:
1) Efficiency
“In order to be efficient, it is necessary to be keen,
to have awareness, and concentration, to be one-pointed
and not distracted.” (ibid) In the context of a psi
session this means that one aims to become aware of
the target video and not the other videos in the pool
(displacement).
2) Equanimity
“This means that there is balance of mind in both
success and failure. If our mind becomes disturbed
by failure and success, then we swing like a pendulum,
. . . from a positive and optimistic approach during
success, to a negative and pessimistic approach during
failure.”(ibid.)
Everyone wanted to be “successful.” Some came with
an expectation of “failure.” Learning that it is the
process that is important and that whatever happens
is useful was very difficult for most people, including
the experimenter! Problems with equanimity and its
related aspects almost certainly contributed to the
psi-missing. One aspect of equanimity is:
3) Absence of expectation
“Never think of renouncing action, only think of renouncing
expectation of the results of the actions performed.”
(ibid.) When we do research we all have our expectations,
our hopes and desires, normally formally outlined
in the hypothesis. The experimenter holds these expectations
and the participants try to perform accordingly to
please the experimenter. There were some participants
who, when they did not get a direct hit, would make
a remark about how they were not fulfilling the expectations
of the experiment.
4) Egolessness
“Egolessness . . . implies that one has to be simple,
sincere and desireless.” (ibid.) Problems with ego
were present throughout the sessions for most of the
participants. Ego contributes both to lack of equanimity
and to expectation. These manifested as people wanting
to be successful because they were a swami, thinking
they were not good enough because they were a student,
and so on.
5) Renunciation of limited desire
“It is understood that when we begin our journey,
the motivating factor is a desire. ‘I wish to’ is
the form of our desire. It is not elimination or renunciation
of this desire but the renunciation of other limiting
desires that is necessary. We must know which are
the limiting desires that hold us back.” (ibid.)
This is an interesting factor because participants
take part in research for a variety of motives. The
one that seems to lead to the most positive results
is one of interest in the process, in what is going
on and inquiring how it works. This desire gives a
motivating force that allows for equanimity. It is
also a key factor in the experimenter effect, since
the experimenter has the greatest desire for a particular
result.
6) Duty, or dharma
The final attribute of karma yoga is considering every
action to be a duty. Obviously having this attitude
helps in a psi experiment because with it one has
complete equanimity. Most of the swamis participated
solely because their guru had asked for their cooperation
– out of duty to their guru. This was not so true
of the students.
These
attributes of karma yoga have been outlined here as possible
aspects of psi functioning, which are amenable to experimental
testing under laboratory conditions. Through exploring
these aspects we may well be able to understand better
the dynamics involved in controlled manifestation of psi.
If it is true that development of meditation, and associated
states of consciousness, are related to a learned, as
opposed to a spontaneous ability to become aware psychically,
then this could transform parapsychology. At present we
either rely on the few superstars, as in the remote viewing
experiments (May, 1996), or the uncertain results from
unselected participants.
CONCLUSION
These studies were a preliminary exploration. Whilst the results
are not statistically significant they are all in the hypothesised
direction, suggesting that more research is needed to explore
possible relationships between years of living a yogic lifestyle
and greater psi awareness. We are encouraged by the few tentative
post hoc findings in the 2003 data we’ve outlined in this paper.
We’re encouraged by the more positive atmosphere surrounding
the data collection process in 2004. We’re also more aware now
of the pitfalls of collecting data in cross-cultural settings,
of the costs of doing so, and of the numerous potential confounds
to be avoided. Based upon our experience to date, we suspect
that further fine-tuning of the design and procedure may yield
interesting data during the next series of experiments with
Tibetan Buddhist meditators.
So far however, as most of the results have been non-significant,
much more research will be needed to clarify the possible relationship
between years of practise of yoga and meditation, and level
of psychic awareness. Perhaps this is because in Patanjali’s
sutras he states that it is only when one has attained a certain
level of Samadhi that the siddhis appear. It is possible that
none of the participants in this study had attained that level
of meditation.
REFERENCES
Batcheldor,
K.J. (1984). Contributions to the theory of PK induction from
sitter group work,” J. of the Amer. Soc. for Psychical Research,
78 (2), 105-122.
Braud,
W.G. (1974).Relaxation as a psi-conducive state,“ Bull.
of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 115 – 118.
Braud,
W.G. (1975). Psi-Conducive States, J. of Communication.
25, 142 -152.
Braud,
W.G. (1978). Psi-conducive conditions: Explorations and interpretations.
In B.Shapin & L. Coly (eds.), Psi and States of Awareness,
Parapsychology Foundation, N.Y., pp.1 – 41.
Braud,
W.G. (1989). Meditation and psychokinesis, Parapsychology
Review, 20, 9 – 11.
Braud,
W. (2006). Patanjali yoga and siddhis: Their relevance to parapsychological
theory and research. In K. R. Rao, M. Cornelissen, & J.
Dalal (eds.), Handbook of Indian Psychology (in preparation).
Braud,
L.W. & Boston, D.A. (1986). Target preference and clairvoyance
in selected subjects following relaxation induction. In D.H.Weiner
&D.I.Radin (eds.) Research in Parapsychology 1985,
Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, pp. 25-28.
Dalton,
K. Steinkamp, F. & Sherwood, S.J. (1996). A dream GESP experiment
using dynamic targets and consensus vote, Proceedings of
the 39th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association,
57 –71.
Dukhan,
H. & Rao, K.R. (1973). Meditation and ESP scoring. In W.G.roll.
R.L. Morris & J.D.Morris (eds.), Research in Parapsychology
1972, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, pp. 148-151.
Harding,
S.E. & Thalbourne, M.A. (1981). Transcendental meditation,
clairvoyant ability and psychological adjustment. In W.G.Roll
& J. Beloff (eds.), Research in Parapsychology 1980, Metuchen,
NJ: Scarecrow Press, pp. 71-73.
Honorton,
C. (1977). Psi and Internal Attention States, in Wolman, B.B.(ed.),
Handbook of Parapsychology, Van Nostrand Rheinhold,
N,Y., pp.435-472.
Honorton,
C. (1981). Psi, Internal Attention states and the Yoga Sutras
of Patanjali, In Shapin, B. & Coly, L. Concepts and
Theories of Parapsychology, Parapsychology Foundation,
NY, pp.55 - 68.
Honorton,
C. (1996). The Ganzfeld Novice: four predictors of initial ESP
performance, In E.Cook (ed.) Research in Parapsychology
1992, Scarecrow Press, US & Britain, pp.22 - 27.
Jahn,
R.G., Dunne, B.J., Nelson, R.D., Dobyns, Y.H. & Bradish,
G.J. (1997). Correlations of random binary sequences with pre-stated
operator intention: a review of a 12-year program. Journal
of Scientific Exploration, 11(3), 345-367.
May,
E.C. (1996). The American Institutes for Research review of
the Department of Defense’s STAR GATE program: A commentary,
Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10 (1), 89 –108.
Murphy,
M., Donovan, S. & Taylor, E. (1999). The Physical and
Psychological Effects of Meditation: A Review of Contemporary
Research with a Comprehensive Bibliography 1931-1996. Institute
of Noetic Sciences, California.
Niranjanananda
Saraswati, Sw., (1993/2002). Yoga Darshan. Yoga Publications
Trust, Munger, India, pp.71-74.
Palmer,
J., Khamashta, K., & Israelson, K. (1979). An ESP ganzfeld
experiment with Transcendental Meditators. J. of the Amer.
Soc. for Psychical Research, 73, 333-348.
Rao,
K.R., Duckan, H. & Rao, P.V.K. (1978). Yogicmeditation and
psi scoring in forced-choice and free-response tests. J.
of Indian Psychology, 1, 160-175.
Rao,
P.V.K. & Rao, K.R. (1982). Two studies of ESP and subliminal
perception, J. of Parapsychology, 46, 185-207.
Roll,
W. G. & Zill, R. (1981). Psi scoring on individual and group
targets before and after meditation. In W.G.Roll & J. Beloff
(eds.), Research in Parapsychology 1980, Metuchen,
NJ: Scarecrow Press, pp. 73-75.
Roney-Dougal,
S.M. (2002). Free-response Psi Experiments in a Yoga Ashram:
Preliminary Studies, Paper presented at the Society for Psychical
Research International Conf., Manchester, England.
Roney-Dougal,
S.M. (2003). Free-response Psi Experiments in a Yoga Ashram:
Preliminary Studies,Part 2, Paper presented at the Society for
Psychical Research International Conf., Manchester, England.
Rosenthal,
R, Rosnow, R.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2000). Contrasts and
effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Satyananda
Saraswati, Sw. (1982). Four Chapters on Freedom. Yoga
Publications Trust, Munger, India.
Schmeidler,
G. (1970). High ESP scores after a swami’s brief instruction
in meditation and breathing. J. of the Amer. Soc. for Psychical
Research, 64, 100-103.
Schmeidler
(1994) . ESP Experiments 1978-1992, In Krippner, S. (ed.)
Advances in Parapsychological Research, vol. 7, McFarland,
USA, pp.104-197.
Solfvin,
G., Kelly, E.F., & Burdick, D. (1978). Some new methods
of analysis for preferential-ranking data. Journal of the
American Society for Psychical Research, 69, 321-326.
Stanford,
R.G. & Palmer, J. (1973) Meditation prior to the ESP task:
An EEG study with an outstanding ESP subject. In Roll, W.G,
Morris, R.L.& Morris, J.D. (eds.), Research in Parapsychology
1972, pp.34 - 36, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, USA.
Tart,
C. T. (ed.) (1969). Altered States of Consciousness,
Wiley, New York.
Tart,
C.T. (1975). States of Consciousness, Dutton, New York.
Tart,
C.T. (1984). Acknowledging and dealing with the fear of psi,”
J. of the Amer. Soc. for Psychical Research, 78, 133-143.
Ullman,
M. & Krippner, S. (1979). Dream studies and Telepathy:
An Experimental Approach, Parapsychology Foundation, New
York.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
(1)
Grateful thanks to Paul Young for his financial assistance;
also to the Perrott-Warwick fund and Bial Foundation, whose
financial assistance helped with funding Jerry Solfvin to complete
the statistical analysis; to Paul Stevens for his ESP programme,
to Jezz Fox for his Precog programme, to David Luke for help
with the questionnaire, to Chris Roe for so very much help in
so many ways – primarily for initiating the statistical analyses
and for help with writing up the paper and grant applications;
to BYB for permission and facilitation to do this research,
and to all the participants who gave so much and without whom
it could not have happened. Deep gratitude also to the editor
and two referees whose comments were of inestimable value and
have improved the paper enormously. Earlier versions of this
paper were presented at the 25th Society for Psychical Research
Conference, Manchester, England, Sept. 2003 and Yoga and Parapsychology
Conf., Andhra Pradesh, India, January 2006, and the complete
version including tables is published in the Journal of Parapsychology
(2006), 70 (1), 91-120 .
(2)
In the current studies ‘psi awareness’ is operationally
defined as the score achieved on the psi task. As this score
is related to the task in which the participant is asked to
become aware of the target picture after the meditation session
and prior to viewing the pictures on the computer, there is
a suggestion that, in line with Yoga Psychology theory, there
is some level of cognitive awareness of the target picture through
psychic means when the person does accurately describe and choose
the target picture at the end of the session. While ‘awareness’
has other implications in other contexts, that is beyond the
scope of the current research.
|
|